<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A query to Macleans about blogging balance.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/12/08/a-query-to-macleans-about-blogging-balance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/12/08/a-query-to-macleans-about-blogging-balance/</link>
	<description>My personal opinions on social and political issues from a progressive standpoint.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:21:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig Hubley</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/12/08/a-query-to-macleans-about-blogging-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-17634</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hubley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=3402#comment-17634</guid>
		<description>(delete that last mangled post please)

Perhaps Taylor&#039;s intemperate propaganda will be muted somewhat by the fact that he now gets paid to sound reasonable or at least sane.  Now let&#039;s see if he can in fact sound sane or if his loyalty is rooted in what Conservative loyalty is usually rooted in - utter confusion and mistaking non-operational abstractions for absolute truths.  Blind hope.  Fear.aid Conservative loyalty is usually rooted in - utter confusion and mistaking non-operational abstractions for absolute truths.  Blind hope.  Fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(delete that last mangled post please)</p>
<p>Perhaps Taylor&#8217;s intemperate propaganda will be muted somewhat by the fact that he now gets paid to sound reasonable or at least sane.  Now let&#8217;s see if he can in fact sound sane or if his loyalty is rooted in what Conservative loyalty is usually rooted in &#8211; utter confusion and mistaking non-operational abstractions for absolute truths.  Blind hope.  Fear.aid Conservative loyalty is usually rooted in &#8211; utter confusion and mistaking non-operational abstractions for absolute truths.  Blind hope.  Fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann D</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/12/08/a-query-to-macleans-about-blogging-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-17615</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=3402#comment-17615</guid>
		<description>This article from The Nation makes for good reading:

What Liberal Media?
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20030224/alterman2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article from The Nation makes for good reading:</p>
<p>What Liberal Media?<br />
<a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20030224/alterman2" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenation.com/doc/20030224/alterman2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metro</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/12/08/a-query-to-macleans-about-blogging-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-17610</link>
		<dc:creator>Metro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=3402#comment-17610</guid>
		<description>roll tide, you can have your own opinions, but you aren&#039;t entitled to your own facts.

Which is the whole problem in a nutshell.

The right wing already has its own media outlets: Global, Fox, National Post, talk radio et al. and cannot stand the sources it cannot control.

Witness the contempt of the &quot;centrist&quot; CPC  for the CBC, which is doing a damned fine job what with having its journalistic nuts cut off over the past twenty years (by both Liberal and Conservative governments).

In actuality, nuanced, fact-based journalism is anaethma to a certain mindset (which while not Conservative in and of itself seems to have gathered at the extreme edge of the philosophy).

And no amount of screaming &quot;liberal media bias&quot; changes that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>roll tide, you can have your own opinions, but you aren&#8217;t entitled to your own facts.</p>
<p>Which is the whole problem in a nutshell.</p>
<p>The right wing already has its own media outlets: Global, Fox, National Post, talk radio et al. and cannot stand the sources it cannot control.</p>
<p>Witness the contempt of the &#8220;centrist&#8221; CPC  for the CBC, which is doing a damned fine job what with having its journalistic nuts cut off over the past twenty years (by both Liberal and Conservative governments).</p>
<p>In actuality, nuanced, fact-based journalism is anaethma to a certain mindset (which while not Conservative in and of itself seems to have gathered at the extreme edge of the philosophy).</p>
<p>And no amount of screaming &#8220;liberal media bias&#8221; changes that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ti-Guy</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/12/08/a-query-to-macleans-about-blogging-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-17599</link>
		<dc:creator>Ti-Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=3402#comment-17599</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Unfortunately the media the US and Canada
are controlled by Liberal elitists. They hate the two venues they cannot control, Fox News, and Talk Radio.&lt;/i&gt;

Wingnut garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Unfortunately the media the US and Canada<br />
are controlled by Liberal elitists. They hate the two venues they cannot control, Fox News, and Talk Radio.</i></p>
<p>Wingnut garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roll tide</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/12/08/a-query-to-macleans-about-blogging-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-17591</link>
		<dc:creator>roll tide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=3402#comment-17591</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&#039;#comment-17590&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Ti-Guy&lt;/a&gt; - 

Unfortunately the media the US and Canada
are controlled by Liberal elitists. They hate the two venues they cannot control, Fox News, and Talk Radio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='#comment-17590' rel="nofollow">@Ti-Guy</a> &#8211; </p>
<p>Unfortunately the media the US and Canada<br />
are controlled by Liberal elitists. They hate the two venues they cannot control, Fox News, and Talk Radio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ti-Guy</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/12/08/a-query-to-macleans-about-blogging-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-17590</link>
		<dc:creator>Ti-Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=3402#comment-17590</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;We Conservatives see these things.&lt;/i&gt;

Unfortunately, Conservative claims about bias always rest on subjective judgements such as &quot;giddiness&quot; and how a particular frame is set up.  It sounds downright paranoid.  In any case, it&#039;s well-known that the corporate media is generally right wing.

I don&#039;t care about bias; I care about good journalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We Conservatives see these things.</i></p>
<p>Unfortunately, Conservative claims about bias always rest on subjective judgements such as &#8220;giddiness&#8221; and how a particular frame is set up.  It sounds downright paranoid.  In any case, it&#8217;s well-known that the corporate media is generally right wing.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care about bias; I care about good journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roll tide</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/12/08/a-query-to-macleans-about-blogging-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-17583</link>
		<dc:creator>roll tide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 22:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=3402#comment-17583</guid>
		<description>The Toronto Star is pure Liberal. You will notice when they have a guest column such as George Will, they will mention that he is a &quot;Conservative Columnist&quot;, but when Mark Shields is a guest Columnist, &quot;Liberal&quot; is not added before his name. 

Last week when the &quot;Coalition&quot; were signing its papers in a ceremony, the CBC news crew on Newsworld,  Don Newman on down were down right giddy on its telecast. As if Canadians were going to be thrilled over this attempted coup. 
The CBC own pollster told a different story to a stunned Don Newman on Friday.

We Conservatives see these things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Toronto Star is pure Liberal. You will notice when they have a guest column such as George Will, they will mention that he is a &#8220;Conservative Columnist&#8221;, but when Mark Shields is a guest Columnist, &#8220;Liberal&#8221; is not added before his name. </p>
<p>Last week when the &#8220;Coalition&#8221; were signing its papers in a ceremony, the CBC news crew on Newsworld,  Don Newman on down were down right giddy on its telecast. As if Canadians were going to be thrilled over this attempted coup.<br />
The CBC own pollster told a different story to a stunned Don Newman on Friday.</p>
<p>We Conservatives see these things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WesternGrit</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/12/08/a-query-to-macleans-about-blogging-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-17579</link>
		<dc:creator>WesternGrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=3402#comment-17579</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a staunch Liberal, but being in the center of the political spectrum, I think the media does a disservice by calling Liberals the &quot;opposite viewpoint&quot; of the hard-right Reform-Cons.  

Honestly, the media needs to put more far-left NDP voices in positions of &quot;opposing&quot; the Cons viewpoint.  I&#039;m not talking about run of the mill, ordinary Dippers.  I&#039;m talking about the hardcore socialists.  

Why?  The debate in Canada won&#039;t shift to the left by bleating on about the differences between Liberals and Cons - this is only viewed as partisan sniping.  By introducing some of the more extreme counterpoints of the left of the NDP, it will display to Canadians how extreme the Cons are. It will also create a &quot;need&quot; for center ground - which would be US, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a staunch Liberal, but being in the center of the political spectrum, I think the media does a disservice by calling Liberals the &#8220;opposite viewpoint&#8221; of the hard-right Reform-Cons.  </p>
<p>Honestly, the media needs to put more far-left NDP voices in positions of &#8220;opposing&#8221; the Cons viewpoint.  I&#8217;m not talking about run of the mill, ordinary Dippers.  I&#8217;m talking about the hardcore socialists.  </p>
<p>Why?  The debate in Canada won&#8217;t shift to the left by bleating on about the differences between Liberals and Cons &#8211; this is only viewed as partisan sniping.  By introducing some of the more extreme counterpoints of the left of the NDP, it will display to Canadians how extreme the Cons are. It will also create a &#8220;need&#8221; for center ground &#8211; which would be US, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carrscanary</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/12/08/a-query-to-macleans-about-blogging-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-17578</link>
		<dc:creator>carrscanary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=3402#comment-17578</guid>
		<description>Media bias is certainly a concern. Where does balance lie, I wonder? To be representative of Canadians views does that mean that if about 40% of Canadians have conservative views that there should be this proportion of conservative leaning pieces in a publication? If so you had better tell the Globe and Mail.
Sadly news is no longer news; it is all opinion even articles not tagged as op ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Media bias is certainly a concern. Where does balance lie, I wonder? To be representative of Canadians views does that mean that if about 40% of Canadians have conservative views that there should be this proportion of conservative leaning pieces in a publication? If so you had better tell the Globe and Mail.<br />
Sadly news is no longer news; it is all opinion even articles not tagged as op ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ti-Guy</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/12/08/a-query-to-macleans-about-blogging-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-17575</link>
		<dc:creator>Ti-Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=3402#comment-17575</guid>
		<description>If &lt;i&gt;Macleans&lt;/i&gt; hadn&#039;t &quot;disappeared* the comments there, there&#039;d be a record of the complaint I was the first to make...that Stephen Taylor&#039;s interests hadn&#039;t been declared, which hadn&#039;t been included in the original post (I checked) but are there now.  What fabulous journalistic integrity.

Anyway, the Conservative Party is smart enough not to have Taylor as an employee.  Rather he occupies a sinecure at the &quot;Manning Institute&quot; (ie. Conservative Party pre-school), which provides him with the necessary distance to claim disinterested party status.

That the establishment media continues to play these stupid games of presenting think tank propaganda as &quot;news&quot; and propagandists as experts is the reason why we should all make sure we don&#039;t spend any money for their &quot;product;&quot;  don&#039;t subscribe to their newspapers or magazines and use AdBlock software when you visit their online venues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If <i>Macleans</i> hadn&#8217;t &#8220;disappeared* the comments there, there&#8217;d be a record of the complaint I was the first to make&#8230;that Stephen Taylor&#8217;s interests hadn&#8217;t been declared, which hadn&#8217;t been included in the original post (I checked) but are there now.  What fabulous journalistic integrity.</p>
<p>Anyway, the Conservative Party is smart enough not to have Taylor as an employee.  Rather he occupies a sinecure at the &#8220;Manning Institute&#8221; (ie. Conservative Party pre-school), which provides him with the necessary distance to claim disinterested party status.</p>
<p>That the establishment media continues to play these stupid games of presenting think tank propaganda as &#8220;news&#8221; and propagandists as experts is the reason why we should all make sure we don&#8217;t spend any money for their &#8220;product;&#8221;  don&#8217;t subscribe to their newspapers or magazines and use AdBlock software when you visit their online venues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
