<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet another poll release showing there are lots of anti-prorogue elitists in Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/01/14/yet-another-poll-release-showing-there-are-lots-of-anti-prorogue-elitists-in-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/01/14/yet-another-poll-release-showing-there-are-lots-of-anti-prorogue-elitists-in-canada/</link>
	<description>My personal opinions on social and political issues from a progressive standpoint.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Pertwee</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/01/14/yet-another-poll-release-showing-there-are-lots-of-anti-prorogue-elitists-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-22228</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Pertwee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=7498#comment-22228</guid>
		<description>On a positive note, there seems to be a lot fewer trolls out there these days. It&#039;s definitely a welcome break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a positive note, there seems to be a lot fewer trolls out there these days. It&#8217;s definitely a welcome break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Francis</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/01/14/yet-another-poll-release-showing-there-are-lots-of-anti-prorogue-elitists-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-22217</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=7498#comment-22217</guid>
		<description>Quit your chattering, you elitist!

We have an arrogant minority PM effectively wielding absolute power over Parliament without a mandate to do so. Yet, in a pure Westminster two-party system, given current voting patterns, Harper would not be PM, he&#039;d be Leader of the Opposition!

Anyway, I&#039;m chattering...

So, how to Harper further down and keep him down? And how to take power away from him? And who is to get it? Does Iggy (elitist!) have the balls to form a coalition with the NDP prior to an election call?

Harper still has a possible bare minority even with these numbers. And, remember, Harper has changed convention so that he can cancel with prorogation any confidence motion. He can prevent an election for several years, if he feels he must, until the numbers suit him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quit your chattering, you elitist!</p>
<p>We have an arrogant minority PM effectively wielding absolute power over Parliament without a mandate to do so. Yet, in a pure Westminster two-party system, given current voting patterns, Harper would not be PM, he&#8217;d be Leader of the Opposition!</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m chattering&#8230;</p>
<p>So, how to Harper further down and keep him down? And how to take power away from him? And who is to get it? Does Iggy (elitist!) have the balls to form a coalition with the NDP prior to an election call?</p>
<p>Harper still has a possible bare minority even with these numbers. And, remember, Harper has changed convention so that he can cancel with prorogation any confidence motion. He can prevent an election for several years, if he feels he must, until the numbers suit him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

