<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best description ever of Harper&#8217;s prorogation mistake.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/02/04/best-description-ever-of-harpers-prorogation-mistake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/02/04/best-description-ever-of-harpers-prorogation-mistake/</link>
	<description>My personal opinions on social and political issues from a progressive standpoint.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimBobby</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/02/04/best-description-ever-of-harpers-prorogation-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-22668</link>
		<dc:creator>JimBobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=7737#comment-22668</guid>
		<description>Thanks. I was looking at the big thing at the top and not the one lower down. I stand corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. I was looking at the big thing at the top and not the one lower down. I stand corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon ABC</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/02/04/best-description-ever-of-harpers-prorogation-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-22665</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon ABC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=7737#comment-22665</guid>
		<description>Hey JB: You may be looking at the wrong part of the post. If you go a bit further down, this is what I see: Liberals - 121
Conservatives - 110, Bloc Quebecois - 49, New Democrats - 28. I believe the EKOS projection today had the Libs at 122 vs. 109 for the Harper party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey JB: You may be looking at the wrong part of the post. If you go a bit further down, this is what I see: Liberals &#8211; 121<br />
Conservatives &#8211; 110, Bloc Quebecois &#8211; 49, New Democrats &#8211; 28. I believe the EKOS projection today had the Libs at 122 vs. 109 for the Harper party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TofKW</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/02/04/best-description-ever-of-harpers-prorogation-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-22664</link>
		<dc:creator>TofKW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=7737#comment-22664</guid>
		<description>JimBobby, you need to look down a little on the site, and on the right hand side. There you should find a pie chart with the label:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;1 Poll Seat Projection EKOS 02/02/10&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Lib-121 / Con-110 / NDP-28 / BQ-49</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JimBobby, you need to look down a little on the site, and on the right hand side. There you should find a pie chart with the label:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;1 Poll Seat Projection EKOS 02/02/10&#8243;</i></p>
<p>Lib-121 / Con-110 / NDP-28 / BQ-49</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimBobby</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/02/04/best-description-ever-of-harpers-prorogation-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-22663</link>
		<dc:creator>JimBobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=7737#comment-22663</guid>
		<description>Ummm... Maybe I&#039;m looking at something other than what you&#039;re looking at, Scott. You&#039;re linking to http://threehundredeight.blogspot.com/2010/02/new-ekos-poll-09-pt-liberal-lead.html regarding projected seats. That shows the CPC with 136 seats vs. LPC with 92. You think that&#039;s good? Granted it&#039;s an improvement over the current standings but the projection shows the combined LPC &amp; NDP at only 122. Even if the LPC were to miraculously take away all of the NDP seats, the CPC would still form a government. Yeah, I know, there are some BQ seats that might fall into LPC hands.

Once again, we&#039;re seeing evidence that FPTP robs us of true democratic representation. I floated &lt;a href=&quot;http://jimbobbysez.blogspot.com/2010/01/lpc-v-ndp-pissing-contest-keeps-harper.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a proposal for ABC cooperation&lt;/a&gt; last week and was roundly trounced by hard core party loyalists. Harper&#039;s poised to win yet again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm&#8230; Maybe I&#8217;m looking at something other than what you&#8217;re looking at, Scott. You&#8217;re linking to <a href="http://threehundredeight.blogspot.com/2010/02/new-ekos-poll-09-pt-liberal-lead.html" rel="nofollow">http://threehundredeight.blogspot.com/2010/02/new-ekos-poll-09-pt-liberal-lead.html</a> regarding projected seats. That shows the CPC with 136 seats vs. LPC with 92. You think that&#8217;s good? Granted it&#8217;s an improvement over the current standings but the projection shows the combined LPC &amp; NDP at only 122. Even if the LPC were to miraculously take away all of the NDP seats, the CPC would still form a government. Yeah, I know, there are some BQ seats that might fall into LPC hands.</p>
<p>Once again, we&#8217;re seeing evidence that FPTP robs us of true democratic representation. I floated <a href="http://jimbobbysez.blogspot.com/2010/01/lpc-v-ndp-pissing-contest-keeps-harper.html" rel="nofollow">a proposal for ABC cooperation</a> last week and was roundly trounced by hard core party loyalists. Harper&#8217;s poised to win yet again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

