<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scott&#039;s DiaTribes &#187; Copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/tag/copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com</link>
	<description>My personal opinions on social and political issues from a progressive standpoint.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:00:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Maybe this CBC iCopyright thing isn&#8217;t so bad after all&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/02/01/maybe-this-cbc-icopyright-thing-isnt-so-bad-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/02/01/maybe-this-cbc-icopyright-thing-isnt-so-bad-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Tribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canadian Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair dealing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=7700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of my commentators in the comments section of my blogpost (who runs Progressive Blogger affiliate Views From the Lake) condemning the CBC&#8217;s new licensing scheme with American copyright &#8220;protectors&#8221; iCopyright has come up with another angle on this business:</p> <p>I think itâ€™s a great business opportunity. I plan on heavy trolling of the Blogging Tories looking for breaches to report to iCopyright. A million bucks is a million bucks!</p> <p>This is a very good point. He&#8217;s referring to the Boing-Boing article which states that &#8220;iCopyright offers a reward of up to $1,000,000 for snitching on bloggers who donâ€™t pay Danegeld to Canadaâ€™s public broadcaster to quote the works [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/02/01/maybe-this-cbc-icopyright-thing-isnt-so-bad-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ridiculous copyright licensing &#8211; no thanks CBC</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/01/30/ridiculous-copyright-licensing-no-thanks-cbc-ill-either-just-paraphrase-or-link/</link>
		<comments>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/01/30/ridiculous-copyright-licensing-no-thanks-cbc-ill-either-just-paraphrase-or-link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Tribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair dealing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/?p=7688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed recently at the CBC website that at their news section, they have fine print at the bottom of their articles stating that &#8220;new copyright licensing is in effect&#8221;. When you click on that, it takes you to a 3rd party group called iCopyright, which then offers a sign-up fee so you can either quote the whole article, or else keep the article on your blog/website etc for a year. Nothing is said about only quoting part of an article however. If you click on the fine print of iCopyright, they warn you of the danger of piracy and so on and so forth. </p> <p>Now, the popular [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2010/01/30/ridiculous-copyright-licensing-no-thanks-cbc-ill-either-just-paraphrase-or-link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Audio Podcast: Panel Discussion on Copyright and Bill C-61</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/08/31/audio-podcast-panel-discussion-on-copyright-and-bill-c-61/</link>
		<comments>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/08/31/audio-podcast-panel-discussion-on-copyright-and-bill-c-61/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Tribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canadian Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill C-61]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=2088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Devin Johnston of the blog devinjohnston.ca had a  podcast on Saturday afternoon to discuss the concerns some of us have with Bill C-61, the proposed bill to update copyright legislation in Canada.  The  group included myself, Mike Park of Rational Reasons, John Klein, who runs Abandoned Stuff by Saskboy, and a special guest, Dr. Sam Trosow, Associate Professor at the University of Western Ontario, jointly appointed to the Faculty of Law and the Faculty of Information and Media Studies,</p> <p>We talked about our concerns of the impact of the Conservative government&#8217;s proposed Copyright legislation on creators and consumers of digital media. Devin&#8217;s blog has the podcast. </p> <p> I&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2008/08/31/audio-podcast-panel-discussion-on-copyright-and-bill-c-61/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

